![]() ![]() ![]() One was a Quartermaster report of 76 tanks lost to date on 10 July. There are two reports of mine losses for the Panthers. Some of the 158-tank shortfall was due to combat losses (including mines), but many were due to mechanical failure. The next reliable strength report available is for the evening 6 July, when 40 tanks were reported operational. The number of Panthers available on the morning of 4 July is known (200), and the number that broke down during the march up on 4 July isĪlso known (two or, possibly, six). The 39th Panzer Regiment was equipped with brand new Panther tanks that suffered from various teething problems which resulted in poor reliability. But it is uncertain whether the 20 tanks reported as lost to mines on 5 July were only from Gross Deutschland or included tanks of the 39th Panzer Regiment. The regiment was attached to the Gross Deutschland Division during the battle. But, a significant percentage of the tanks were broken down rather than combat losses. On 4 July 1943 it had 200, and on 6 July 40 tanks, ready for action. Losses in the 39th Panzer Regiment at Kursk are confusing. It reads as follows:ĪPPENDIX II: THE 39th PANZER REGIMENT AT KURSK Appendix II had a brief discussion of the tank losses in the 39th Panzer Regiment due to mines in our report on “The Military Consequences of a Complete Landmine Ban.” This is from. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |